

Fandango Film Commentator
Fandango Film Commentator
His and Hers Award Picks
Oscar Winners
Chuck Says:
Here are my observations on the big winners, whilst watching the telecast…

© Getty
Best Supporting Actor - Alright, so we saw it coming, but, it’s always good to see Javier Bardem at the awards platform. He deserved the win, too. Everyone in this category was strong, but Javier’s creepy (yet funny!) bad guy Anton Chigurh will go down in cinema history as one of the all-time memorable villains. Kudos to Bardem, too, for his passionate acceptance speech. I could only understand the half that was in English, but it sure was passionate, and I’m sure his mom appreciated it.
Best Supporting Actress - Whoa, Tilda Swinton won? There’s always a surprise winner in one of the supporting categories, but I’m not sure anyone in Vegas called this coup. Thinking back on it, congrats to Tilda. She was spot-on, and wasn’t afraid to show the sweat (literally) in Michael Clayton. Cate and Ruby might have won the accolades leading up to Oscar night, but this was a genuine surprise, followed by an equally funny tip-of-the-hat to her agent and Hollywood golden boy George Clooney.
Best Actress - OK., I take that back, the suprise win of the night might be Marion Cotillard for La Vie en Rose. She was an early frontrunner, but as of late, it looked like the only contender who could take the win away from Julie Christie was Juno’s little girl that could, Ellen Page. I would have liked that, but props to Cotillard. You could tell she was humbled and gracious for the award, and who doesn’t like that?
Best Actor - Daniel Day-Lewis is the man. Without his powerhouse performance, There Wouldn’t Be Blood. Day-Lewis’ and Bardem’s awards were the most predictable, and to me, the most deserved. Their characters’ souls couldn’t be more corrupted, but these are artful and complete transformations.
Best Director - I had expected an upset victory for P.T. – but I’m happy to be wrong. The Coens have been inspiring all of us film fans, along with filmmakers, for decades, and as with Martin Scorsese’s win last year, no one’s going to quibble with a Coen win. Plus, I like their no-b.s. approach in their acceptance speeches. Ethan saying only “Thank you,” and Joel saying something to the effect that making films now isn’t much different than the movies they were making when they were 12. Right on.
Best Picture - To quote the movie, “you can’t stop what coming” – and yep, it seems to be a No Country world we live in. All of the nominees were great, but No Country is the true “Best Picture” amongst them - even if you don’t like the ending (actually my favorite part of the film). I hope its Oscar win translates to more people going to see it for the first time - or going to see it again.

© Getty
I’m happy, too, that Once picked up Best Song for “Falling Slowly"…and (was it an Academy first?) that they let Marketa Irglova come back onstage to complete her acceptance speech. I loved what she said about hope connecting all of us – whether it’s at the movies or in the real world.
Stacie Says:
All I can say is, you never can guess what the Academy will do come Oscar time!

© Getty
I’m blown away by the winners in the lead and supporting actress categories. Marion Cotillard over Julie Christie for Best Actress? I never would have thought it. I mean, her performance was lauded and recognized…but Christie is one of Hollywood’s long-standing great actresses who hasn’t received an Oscar since 1966. Cotillard has, what, Big Fish and A Good Year to her credit?
I’m a little sad that Ellen Page didn’t win, although I didn’t think she had much of a shot—I’m always down for the underdog.

© Getty
I also never thought Tilda Swinton would have won Best Supporting (and maybe she didn’t expect to win either, given that Hefty bag of a getup)—I have to say that came out of left field. (Although it was one way of giving recognition to Michael Clayton.)
On to the expected…No Country for Best Picture, Joel and Ethan Coen for Director and Javier Bardem for Supporting Actor…none of these winners was a surprise. Neither was Daniel Day-Lewis’s win for Best Actor in There Will Be Blood–Chuck and I predicted that one from the get-go.
In any case, gotta love the Oscars…surprises, upsets, red-carpet successes and disasters, and above all… the movies. Now on to next year…
Best Picture
Stacie Says:
There’s no question that No Country for Old Men is the clear frontrunner for Best Picture, now that we’re in the final countdown to Oscars. The film won best motion picture at the SAG Awards, earned eight Oscar nominations, has been named the year’s best film by countless critics’ associations and tops most Oscar oddsmakers’ lists. It’s what I called earlier in the awards race, and what I still think will win.

© Paramount Vantage
There’s a slight chance There Will Be Blood could split the Academy’s vote, leaving the door open for Michael Clayton. Atonement’s day came and went, and Juno is a really long shot, despite the fact that it made the most money of all the nominated films. I’d love to see it win, but among such weighty films as these, I think it’s too light to be considered seriously.

© Fox Searchlight
Chuck Says:
Despite the ‘heated’ race that some will call for Best Picture between No Country and There Will Be Blood, I really think this category is no contest. Here are five nominees and five predictions.
Will Win: No Country. Both movies are great, but Country wins the accessibility award by a hair, and the overall award as well.
Could Win: O.k, maybe Blood pulls the upset, but the movie’s current“I Drink Your Milkshake!” quote campaign probably wins more fanboy votes than actual Academy Award ballots.

© Getty
Won’t Win: Michael Clayton. Some predict a split vote could allow multiple (surprise) nominee Clayton a chance for gold. I predict no split at all, and a P.T. win for his warped, uncomfortable vision in the Best Director category.

© Focus Features
No Chance: Atonement. Yes, it looks tailor-made for Oscar glory. But in a maverick year for great offbeat movies, it looks like Oscar voters will pick a non-traditional flick.
Should Win: Juno. In this case, millions of moviegoers and a $100 million plus box office haul actually aren’t so wrong at all. Juno, in this blogger’s opinion, is a deserving and original Best Picture. Never mind the backlash. Ellen Page is that good, and so are the supporting actors, story and movie around her.
Check out our earlier Picture predictions.
Best Director

Stacie Says:
Look out! Right now it looks like a virtual No Country for Old Men stampede, and everyone better just get out of the way. (If Daniel Day-Lewis doesn’t win Best Actor, I’ll eat my shoe. OK, my gym shoe.)

© Getty
As the Best Picture frontrunner, No Country’s directors, Ethan and Joel Coen, are no doubt working on their Best Director acceptance speeches this very minute.
The Academy doesn’t often split Picture and Director winners, but at the same time, isn’t afraid to. Cases in point: In 2005 when Crash won over Best Director Ang Lee’s Brokeback Mountain; Roman Polanski’s out-of-left-field win for The Pianist, which lost to Chicago (2002). So it’s not common, but not unheard of, for a director to win while his film does not.
Of all the nominees I think Julian Schnabel has the least chance. I’m even surprised he was nominated, as his film The Diving Bell and the Butterfly was hardly a blip on anyone’s radar, and didn’t get a Best Picture nomination. Must be because his approach was totally different and creative, seen from the point of view of a man completely paralyzed other than his left eye. (Interesting that Atonement got the nod instead, whose director Joe Wright was left off the list.)
Maybe Paul Thomas Anderson for There Will Be Blood? The film earned eight nominations, as many as No Country, and with Day-Lewis’s consistent wins, is gaining momentum in this final stretch.

© Fox Searchlight
It’s also possible those two top contenders could split the vote, leaving the race open to Jason Reitman, whose Juno clearly has lots of love and support in the Academy. There’s also Tony Gilroy for Michael Clayton, although I still contend that movie won’t walk away with much other than some deserved nominations.
Ultimately, I think the Coen brothers can polish up their mantels, and I can keep my gym shoes in the closet where they belong.
Chuck Says:
I’m going to go out on a limb – although not too far – and predict a split vote when it comes to Best Picture and Best Director. No Country will pick up Picture, but Blood’s P.T. Anderson will be declared Best Director.

© Getty
Stacie predicted that a possible split vote in the Director category could allow Juno or Michael Clayton to gain steam, but I think Academy voters, rightfully so, will see fit to award the leading contenders in different ways.
Does that make No Country the true Best Pic and Anderson the real Best Director? Well, not neccesarily, but I think ‘repeat viewing factor’ comes into play when films are equally great and dark and one is a tad more accessible.
Let’s be clear. While they’ll both make you squirm, Blood is the more uncomfortable movie to sit through…which makes a split vote a reasonable choice. This category honors the “Best ACHIEVEMENT in Directing,” and has as much to do with boldness of vision and execution. In the end, fans of both movies should be happy if they divy up the top two prizes.

© Getty
It’s great, too, that Schnabel’s visual artistry has been recognized for Diving Bell , and kudos to new kid Jason Reitman and scribe-turned-director Tony Gilroy, but there’s a reason that these two daring, disturbing, downright masterful films have been lauded by all the critics and awards groups. For P.T. – in this category at least – there will be gold!
Best Actor/Actress Update

Chuck Says:
UPDATE:
Looking back at my earlier predictions, I see I called a close race for the Best Actor prize between George Clooney for Michael Clayton and Daniel Day-Lewis for There Will Be Blood. Scratch that. All signs (and a great SAG Awards acceptance speech) point to Day-Lewis winning this category hands down, two thumbs up and any other way you call it.

© Warner Bros. Pictures
And that’s a good thing. As much as we loved Depp’s singing in Sweeney Todd and the surprise nominations for Tommy Lee Jones (In the Valley of Elah) and Viggo Mortensen (Eastern Promises) Day-Lewis’ performance was absolutely mesmerizing. As dark as the movie and his character get, there’s no taking your eyes off of him. He’s that brilliant.

© Picturehouse
Same for Julie Christie in Away from Her. I still would love to see Ellen Page pull the underdog win for Juno, but who are we kidding? Christie’s the vet, Christie’s won nearly every award, and Christie’s phenomenal as the movie’s Alzheimer’s patient. Marion Cotillard could also pull the upset win for La Vie en Rose, but eh, I’m going with the safe and sure bet. Good to see, though, that Laura Linney’s up for The Savages and yes, Oscars, you love her, you really love Cate Blanchett (the surprise – well maybe it shouldn’t be that surprising – nominee for Elizabeth: The Golden Age).
Stacie Says:
UPDATE:
A lot has changed in the race for gold this year, now that the Golden Globes and Screen Actors Guild Awards are behind us. All signs point to Daniel Day-Lewis winning for There Will Be Blood – an upset would be a major shocker. And sigh…I seriously doubt this is Johnny Depp’s year, with so many powerhouse acting performances, like George Clooney in Michael Clayton, in the running. Some of my earlier Actress picks, like Angelina Jolie and Helena Bonham Carter (OK, a long shot), are pretty much out of the race, and I’m putting my money on Away From Hers’ Julie Christie to win when the envelope is opened.

© Lionsgate
Check out our earlier predictions on the Best Actor and Best Actress Oscar contenders .
SAG Awards
Stacie Says:
I wasn’t surprised so much by who walked off with SAG Awards as I was by the show itself. With the strike putting all of Hollywood on hold and the recent star-less Golden Globes “ceremony,” awards season has been a bleak affair thus far.
So it was more than refreshing to get a glimpse of so many actors I love (and desperately miss in primetime), offering barely a word about the strike, simply giving thanks to their coworkers and the industry in a tight two-hour ceremony.

© Getty
Of the major film categories, the only “surprise” outcome was Ruby Dee’s Supporting Actress win over Cate Blanchett , who I thought would have won for her award-baiting, gender-bending turn in the Bob Dylan doc (I’m Not There). However, SAG had previously awarded Dee with a Life Achievement Award, and the acting community loves and respects her, so it wasn’t too shocking that she’d get her first acting award for American Gangster.
In a bizarro moment, presenter Josh Brolin offered some backhanded compliments for Hollywood and his own film’s directors, saying the industry’s emphasis on blockbusters is “backfiring” and how fun that is for “us actors.” He went on to call Joel and Ethan Coen “freaky little people” who did a “freaky little movie, whether you like the ending or not.”
Huh?

award for Best Actor.
© Getty
In contrast, Daniel Day-Lewis’s moving tribute in which he dedicated his Best Actor award to Heath Ledger was one of the evening’s highlights.
All in all, good show, people. Now if you can just get back to work, already?
Chuck Says:
As for the winners of the SAG Awards…yeah, that sounds about predictable. Daniel-Day Lewis for There Will Be Blood, Julie Christie for Away from Her, Javier Bardem for No Country, and Best Ensemble for the movie, too. Check.
Like Stacie said, the only minor surprise was Ruby Dee’s win for American Gangster, although, personally, I’d hoped Catherine Keener would pick it up for Into the Wild, which, despite having the most nominations, was entirely shut out.

Cate Blanchett.
© Getty
No knock to Ruby, but if Keener wasn’t going to be the winner, it would have been nice to see Cate Blanchett take the stage.
It’s likely she would have also paid tribute to I’m Not There co-star Heath Ledger, who – it’s still hard to believe – died less than a week ago.
That acknowledgment passed instead to Day-Lewis, whose moving words (citing Ledger’s final scene in Brokeback as “one of the finest moments in cinema I’ve ever seen”) were definitely the highlight of the show.

© Getty
The night otherwise seemed dedicated to Hollywood’s older set. Besides Dee, actor and WWII vet Charles Durning took in a 15-minute presentation for lifetime achievement (clips from The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas?), and Mickey Rooney soaked in a standing ovation for an extended stay at the podium as a presenter.
Anyway…now on to the Academy Awards, where hopefully – cross your fingers for those negotiations – we’ll get to see another event with actors live and in person.
Oscar Nominations: Snubs and Surprises
Chuck Says:
The Oscars noms are now out, and all in all, the Academy did a good job, with a few glaring omissions.

on the set of Into the Wild.
© Paramount Vantage
As in, “what’s up with the Into the Wild near-shutout?” No nomination for director Sean Penn. No nomination for actor Emile Hirsch. No nomination for supporting actress Catherine Keener. And no nomination for Best Picture.
Yeah, yeah, ok, Juno, the other underdog critics’ (and audience) favorite did get a bunch of nods. But still, Wild coming up with nada is a huge disappointment. Everybody I’ve talked to loved this movie (at least up to its unconventional ending – although many loved it even more because of it).

© Universal Pictures
The other less egregious omissions include…American Gangster shut out of most categories, notably Denzel Washington for Best Actor and Ridley Scott for Best Director; Angelina Jolie being a no-show in the Best Actress list for A Mighty Heart; and wow, no love at all for Hairspray.
Maybe you could see that coming with last year’s missing noms for Dreamgirls but still…Travolta and company put on a much more energetic and colorful show than some other recent musical nominees (i.e. Chicago and Moulin Rouge)
And then there’s another amazingly “what’s-up-with-that?” absentee. Sweeney Todd, where’d you go? Apparently, not to the Oscars dance. At least Johnny Depp and the film’s costumes and art direction got well-deserved nominations. But did it get snubbed in other major categories because it was a musical? Or too bloody? No, that can’t be it, since critics’ winners There Will Be Blood and No Country for Old Men were in full attendance in most of the big categories. Very, very strange.
Still, I’m a happy camper for the most part. The no-noms for Wild are disturbing, but I’m happy that another outdoors-y picture got in there: my fellow surfers in Surf’s Up was a surprise nominee for Best Animated Feature (take that, Homer Simpson! D’oh!) and kudos to 30-year-old Jason Reitman for picking up a Best Director nomination for the fabulous Juno, which is only his second feature film. A Oscar nod at age 30? Man, I’m starting to feel like a slacker.
Stacie Says:
So ultimately, it all came down as one might have expected. There were so many deserving movies and performances this year that it’s understandable some are left out. But I’m surprised, most of all, by a few things:
The Academy leaving Into the Wild out of any major category (other than Best Supporting Actor) feels like a pointed slap in Sean Penn’s face, especially after the film has been lauded by critics and guilds this entire awards season. Astoundingly, Enchanted earned three nods in the Best Song category, leaving Eddie Vedder’s Wild tracks out in the cold. Well then!
Angelina Jolie’s Best Actress-worthy performance in A Mighty Heart was one of the most glaring omissions. She carried the movie and the role was based on a real-life tragedy. Is the Academy “over” Jolie?
No Denzel Washington for American Gangster Best Actor? Again, maybe it’s “nomination overload” as far as the Academy is concerned…he turns in at least one great performance every year, it seems; maybe voters think they can be more choosy.
I’m a little surprised Ben Foster (3:10 to Yuma) was overlooked in the Best Supporting Actor category. In fact, that film got no love at all, except for Best Score (well-deserved) and Sound Mixing. I didn’t expect it to pull in much in the very top categories, so I figured they’d give Foster a nom partly to recognize the film. Kind of like Wild’s Supporting Actor nominee Hal Holbrook.

© Sony Pictures Animation
I didn’t really expect The Simpsons Movie to get nominated, but I am surprised Surf’s Up was the film to upstage Homer and the gang. People knocked Simpsons for being like an extended TV episode, but I found the animation really impressive and the movie was tons of fun.
As for Sweeney Todd, I didn’t think it would pull in any major nominations other than Depp’s. I sense it’s not the kind of film the Academy would really take seriously, I don’t think they take Tim Burton seriously, and it’s pretty obvious how the Academy feels about musicals generally. Same with Hairspray–although I thought John Travolta might have been recognized.

© Warner Bros.
Michael Clayton? Really? I figured Clooney would be a lock for a nomination, but Best Picture, Director, Actor, and Supporting Actor nominations? The Academy clearly loves George Clooney, but I think there were other more worthy movies and performances that deserved recognition.
Tommy Lee Jones in In the Valley of Elah (instead of Denzel)–I don’t get this one at all. In a movie that hardly anyone saw, and wasn’t a critical favorite? Hmm.
Cate Blanchett gets nominated for two different roles in Best and Supporting Actress categories…I’d have thought one or the other.
It’s anyone’s guess whether we’ll see any of these nominees on the red carpet or at the podium on February 24. AMPAS is saying the show will in fact go on one way or another, and as I write this, the Writers Guild is back in negotiations with the studios. No matter what, this year is breaking all the rules—and I can’t wait for the outcome of this tight race.
Golden Globes
Chuck Says:
Well, there wasn’t much of a show at the Golden Globes. But, there were winners. Not having a show, or celebrities, or acceptance speeches, may actually diminish the role of the Globes leading up to the main event (if there is one) that should be the ‘08 Academy Awards. Then again, perusing the winners, there were already surprises that seemed to favor “Oscar type” material leading up to the event.
Whereas the other critics groups have been favoring No Country for Old Men and There Will Be Blood, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association went with a few old stand-bys..big period pieces and/or established musicals with lavish set designs, huge (or English) movie stars, and the requisite number of positive reviews. Thus, ladies and gents, the winners for Best Drama and Best Musical or Comedy… Atonement and Sweeney Todd.

© Focus
Likewise, the acting honors seemed to follow tradition and esteemed reputations. Veterans (and previous Oscar winners) Julie Christie and Daniel Day-Lewis picked up the dramatic awards for Away from Her and There Will Be Blood, while Hollywood’s favorite son Johnny Depp and another period piece revelation, Marion Cotillard as singer Edith Piaf in La Vie En Rose, won for best acting in the Musical/Comedy category.

© Weinstein Company
For the supporting roles, the surprise was that there wasn’t much of a surprise. Cate Blanchett has already won accolades, and won here, too, for her version of Bob Dylan in I’m Not There. And Javier Bardem, a seeming lock for his embodiment of warped evilness in No Country, was a lock after all.
The writers’ strike spoiled the fun of what’s usually the most spontaneous amongst Hollywood awards shows, and somehow, the announced winners (although definitely acclaimed and arguably deserved) followed suit.
There’s still a lot of unpredictability ahead.
Will the Oscars even go on? Who knows? And yes, Atonement is a pageantry film built for Academy praise. But the overwhelming number of awards already heaped on the darker Blood and No Country shouldn’t be discounted yet.
Nor should other frontrunners like directors P.T. Anderson and the Coen Brothers, and actors such as Juno’s Ellen Page, Michael Clayton’s George Clooney and Gone Baby Gone’s Amy Ryan.

© Miramax Films
A little over a month to go…which is plenty of time for some twists, surprises and shocking upsets.
Stacie Says:
The ’08 Golden Globes certainly lacked some…luster.
Without the red carpet glitz and champagne-laden ceremony and after-parties, whatever excitement the Globes drummed up had to come from its awards themselves. To me, the results were less than thrilling.

© Paramount Vantage
Given its international and cross-cultural leanings, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association unsurprisingly awarded a big British period piece (Atonement) with Best Dramatic Pic. Best Dramatic Actor/Actress went to Daniel Day-Lewis and Julie Christie (the way all the awards shows and critics’ picks are going, those two are a lock for Academy Awards). Johnny Depp won Best Actor in a Comedy/Musical, as did his Sweeney Todd for Best Comedy/Musical. Not that I’m upset about it, but no shockers there—the HFPA adores Depp and everything he does.

© Paramount Pictures
As the last major awards show before Oscars, the Globes’ dubious distinction of being an “Oscar predictor” (24 of 44 best dramas have won the best picture Oscar) has gone somewhat downhill. In the last three years, Globes’ picks The Aviator, Brokeback Mountain and Babel weren’t Academy winners. Maybe the current trend is for Academy voters is to purposely go against the HFPA’s picks for Best Drama.

© Miramax Films
After all, the association is made up of less than 100 little-known foreign journalists (who have the reputation for being more star-struck fans than respected film critics) whose awards have less to do with predicting Oscar these days than with putting on a great star-studded show. Entertaining? Sure. Whether it means anything or if frontrunning films like No Country will win in the end remains to be seen.
In the end, without the stargazing and celebration, the Globes were devoid of sound and fury, pretty much signifying nothing.
Awards Season Overview
Chuck Says:
The only thing certain about this year’s awards shows is uncertainty. Depending on how you look at it, that can be good or bad, but it will definitely, definitely be interesting.
Due to the ongoing writers’ strike, the future of the Golden Globe and Oscar red carpet proceedings is as cloudy as that White Russian cocktail in The Big Lebowski.
It’s a sad and hopefully not inevitable fact of life, but it is fitting with the up-in-the-air nature of this year’s season.
The things that were certain in 2007 (and the reason it’s hard to figure this all out) were lots of great movies and great box office. The men and women who make movies may not be getting along, but last year was one of their best ever in terms of commercial and critical acclaim.
The common complaint amongst critics now compiling top 10 lists is that there are too many good movies that could make the cut. No one film dominated. No one actress or actor is the clear winner. And if you’re a movie lover, that means you have lots to choose from at the cineplex and on DVD.
A couple of notes heading into cinema’s version of an international play-off:

No Country for Old Men.
© Miramax
The Coen brothers’ No Country for Old Men and P.T. Anderson’s There Will Be Blood are probably the lead-off contenders for the top prize, with No Country picking up Best Film from the prestigious New York Film Critics Circle and Blood proclaimed top dog by the L.A. Film Critics.

© Paramount Vantage
Atonement, a period piece with pedigree, and Sean Penn’s affecting Into the Wild have both earned a bunch of SAG nominations, so don’t count them out. Plus, sleeper hit Juno could still be a Little Miss Sunshine-esque underdog.
Acting categories are equally mystifying. Will it be Marillion Cotillard as singer Edith Piaf in La Vie en Rose? Or veteran Julie Christie as a victim of Alzheimers in the poignant Away from Her? On the male front, will Johnny Depp as Sweeney Todd slash his way past Daniel Day-Lewis’ equally dark and fascinating performance in Blood?
What’s nice to see is that movie buffs and general audiences all got something at the movies in 07 (beyond just the sequels and threequels). Pictures like Juno, No Country for Old Men, Michael Clayton and Sweeney Todd have all shown that the line between commercial movies and critical darlings is a thin one indeed. Movies like Paul Greengrass’ The Bourne Ultimatum, and performances like Will Smith’s in I Am Legend further show there’s room to keep merging great filmmaking with big, money-making vehicles.
It’s been a wild ride so far, and likely to just get wilder.
Stacie Says:
I’m with Chuck on this year’s huge uncertainty. All too often the Oscar ceremony is a pretty ho-hum event and you’re lucky if there’s one surprise upset. The intrigue this year stems not only from the wide open race for gold, but how the aforementioned writers’ strike will affect the presentations.
As it stands now, the Screen Actors Guild Awards and Independent Spirit Awards broadcasts are the only guaranteed to happen. The Writers’ Guild has all but officially refused the Hollywood Foreign Press Association’s request for a waiver allowing writers to work the Golden Globes and dispensing with a red carpet picket line. In a show of solidarity, SAG is urging their members to boycott the Globes altogether (the WGA granted SAG a waiver for their show). So those of you looking forward to seeing the stars tipsy on Moet and stumbling their speeches on primetime TV, don’t hold your breath.
This begs the question: In Hollywood, where the show always goes on – will it?

© Warner Bros.
Ultimately, Oscar winners will emerge, televised or not. In my perfect world I’d love to see Johnny Depp’s crazed revenge-seeker in Sweeney Todd sneak by Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood. The man took a huge chance and successfully pulled off that weird revenge tale, mostly in song—give him some love.

© Fox Searchlight
I’d also thrill to see Juno snatch Best Pic out of the hands of Joel and Ethan Coen’s No Country for Old Men, and youngster Ellen Page win Best Actress—sure, Julie Christie is a venerable Hollywood denizen, but why not recognize Page’s endearing, multi-layered performance as Juno’s pregnant teen?
I hope the show does go on - in all its ostentatious, glamorous glory. This year’s surprises will come fast and furious, which should make it one of the more exciting ceremonies in years.
Best Picture
Chuck Says:
The Academy has a tough choice for this year’s Best Picture, but that’s a good thing. There is no one dominant movie. There are, however, three emerging from the critics’ picks and they are all "bloody
good."

No Country for Old Men.
© Miramax Films
It’s a showdown between the Coen Brothers’ slow-burning, modern western No Country for Old Men, " P.T. Anderson’s even more tightly coiled There Will Be Blood and Tim Burton’s blood-spurting musical, Sweeney Todd.
All three films are deserving. The filmmakers are in complete control over their craft, No Country’s Javier Bardem, Blood’s Daniel Day-Lewis and Sweeney’s Johnny Depp deliver unforgettable performances as embodiments of warped humanity, and all three movies are bold cinematic achievements.
The one thing that could throw this race out of whack is the “dark” factor. I think the best picture is No Country for Old Men, although There Will Be Blood is a close second. But I don’t know that I would watch them over and over. Objectively, these films should win. Were they my favorites? Umm, no.
Thankfully, 2007 also offered some lighter fare covering a wide range of genres and moods.
Juno deserves Best Picture consideration, not just a Best Screenplay nomination (which is what many great movies over the years [i.e. The Usual Suspects] receive as a consolation prize). Besides the jarring effect of the dialogue in the first ten minutes, the movie’s pretty flawless. It has it all - expert direction from Jason Reitman, a breakthrough performance from Ellen Page as a sassy pregnant teen, and a perfect supporting cast.
Another movie that will likely get the nomination, but also deserves a win, is Sean Penn’s Into the Wild. You
will never forget its one-on-one scenes between Emile Hirsch as young traveler Christopher McCandless and
the people he meets: Catherine Keener’s hippie mom, Hal Holbrook’s grandfather figure and Vince Vaughn’s
likeable farmer.
Stacie Says:
At roughly 25 percent, actors make up the largest voting block of the Academy, which is why the Screen Actors Guild Awards have become a great barometer for predicting Oscar nominations—think Little Miss
Sunshine and Crash. Although only five of the 11 eventual winners of SAG’s top category have
gone on to snag Oscar’s top category, the SAG nominations help inspire Academy voters’ minds when it comes to their own nominations.

© New Line Cinema
With the Guild’s recent nominations for Outstanding Performance by a Cast, the playing field has changed
some. I wouldn’t have expected Hairspray or 3:10 to Yuma to be included (perhaps it was all those free DVDs to SAG members?), or Atonement and Charlie Wilson’s War to be completely snubbed without a single nomination in any category for either film. I’m still thinking Atonement will get an Oscar nomination, at least, but that pic’s not looking like the frontrunner it was a few months ago.
It would be awesome if Juno made the nominees list in January—but would the Academy, an older group
of voters, go for the lovable comedy about a mouthy, knocked up 16-year-old? Methinks no. It wouldn’t win,
in any case.
I wish Ratatouille would make the list, although now that the Academy added the Best Animated Picture category, chances at a Best Pic nom are pretty much non-existent. Still, the incredible animation, along with terrific voice-over work and a wonderful, heartfelt story, make it an absolutely worthy contender.

in American Gangster.
© Universal Pictures
Intriguingly, most of the films noted as Oscar frontrunners are male-centered: American Gangster, No Country for Old Men, Michael Clayton, Sweeney Todd and There Will Be Blood all rest on killer performances by their leading men. I think Clayton and Blood will be considered too small for real Best Pic consideration. Gangster was more audience friendly, but will it be considered too big and commercial? Johnny Depp was excellent in Sweeney Todd but its chances at Oscar are about nil despite the Globe best musical/comedy nomination.
My gut feeling says No Country for Old Men, nominated for both a Golden Globe and SAG and on numerous critics’ awards lists, looks right now like the one to beat.
Best Actor
Stacie Says:
Maybe it’s me, but does it seem like more actors turned in powerhouse performances in ’07 than in previous years? Awards givers didn’t have to plumb the indies for standouts this year, either; a lot of big-studio movies offered plenty of worthy acting, in some cases by more than one performer in the same film.
Some actors even have multiple (if long) shots at nominations: Russell Crowe for 3:10 to Yuma (Best Actor)/American Gangster (Supporting) , Josh Brolin for No Country for Old Men (Best Actor)/American Gangster (Supporting), Philip Seymour Hoffman for The Savages (Best Actor)/Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead (Best Actor)/ Charlie Wilson’s War (Supporting).
There Will Be Blood.
© Paramount Vantage
I’m going to bet Daniel Day-Lewis will be the winner this year for There Will Be Blood. Critics are going crazy for his performance as a slick, misanthropic oilman; he hasn’t won since 1990; and the film, releasing the day after Christmas, will be fresh on voters’ minds. His character was as unlikeable as they come, which some say could hurt his chances.

© Paramount Pictures
Personally, I’d love the talented, good-looking, seriously eccentric Johnny Depp to finally win this year. He’s been nominated twice and starred in diverse roles in so many notable big-budget and indie movies. Playing the demon barber in Sweeney Todd is the capper on a brilliant career. Awarding him would be a long overdue gesture and a warranted one. He did just get nominated for a Golden Globe—albeit in the musical/comedy category.

© Warner Bros. Pictures
Other obvious contenders…George Clooney gave Michael Clayton’s troubled, back-room-dealing lawyer tremendous depth and complexity. He’s both vulnerable and world-weary as the go-to guy for lawyers in need of damage control, at the same time looking for his own misplaced moral compass. Critics loved the film—but it didn’t really catch fire with the general public.
Perennial nominee Denzel Washington did a great job in a good movie (American Gangster) and I think he’ll get a nomination for sure. But the win? I don’t think so. Same with Russell Crowe (3:10 to Yuma); besides, he’s got competition in that movie with Christian Bale’s lauded performance. James McAvoy got one of Atonement’s seven Golden Globe nominations, but even though this is the kind of epic period drama the Academy loves, I doubt he’ll win the Oscar.
It’s gonna be a good, close race!
Chuck Says:
Best Actor (and Best Actress) at the Academy Awards is usually the safe bet. I also think it’s the one award the Academy almost always gets right. Forest Whitaker for The Last King of Scotland, Philip Seymour Hoffman for Capote and Jamie Foxx for Ray were all great, recent picks, and this year should be no different.
The final showdown, in my opinion, will be George Clooney in Michael Clayton vs. Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood. As with so many categories this year, it’s not a guaranteed home run for either actor, but I think that’s the sure-fire match-up.
Both are big names. Both movies are prestige showcases for the actors. Both actors have previously won Oscars for their performances. And both guys are well-respected, veteran players who consistently align themselves with A-list talent and A-list projects that deliver.
Clooney’s turn as a corporate fixer may trump Day-Lewis’ rotten oil digger, perhaps because “Clayton” is more watchable, palatable and entertaining than the superbly crafted "Blood."
But if the Academy checks their conscience, Day-Lewis’ performance is the more fearless. Unlike Clooney’s turn, Day-Lewis ventures into dark territory without regard to audience sympathy. He dares you to keep watching, and no matter how corrupted his soul, it’s impossible to turn away. He’s that riveting.

© MGM
There are other fairly predictable nominees (Ryan Gosling’s sure to be nominated for the second year in a row for his committed performance as the affable, impaired lead in Lars and the Real Girl), but besides Day-Lewis as the rightful winner, here are some other "for your consideration" candidates. Hopefully, there’s still room for one of these two picks on the list.
Will Smith carries the world (and December’s box office) on his shoulders in I Am Legend and delivers, both as movie star and first-class actor. Watch for his last scene. I’ve seen it twice with a full crowd, and everyone, from the film buffs to the casual moviegoer, becomes personally entangled in his character’s emotional ordeal.

© MGM
The other actor who should be getting more attention is Christian Bale in Rescue Dawn. Bale’s developing into a mainstream movie star with the Batman franchise, but he’s continuing to surprise and inspire with his choices in the independent arena. He’s fascinating as the real-life war hero in Werner Herzog’s Dawn, and he
was fantastic this year, too, alongside Russell Crowe in 3:10 to Yuma, and as one version of Bob Dylan in I’m Not There. Bale is also that type of high-caliber, versatile performer, and if he could somehow come from behind (as Adrien Brody did a few years back in The Pianist), it would make the race infinitely more interesting.
Best Actress
Chuck Says:
This week’s category is Best Actress at the Academy Awards. Unlike its sister category, Best Supporting Actress, the winner here is often times exactly who you thought it would be.
Last year, it was almost an after thought when awards season queen Helen Mirren finally picked up the top actress prize at the Oscars. Ditto 2005 when Reese Witherspoon won for Walk the Line. And likewise for 2004 Million Dollar Baby winner Hilary Swank.
in Walk the Line.
© 20th Century Fox
So what’s in store this year? As with the Best Picture category, there isn’t one frontrunner. But, it does seem extraordinarily likely that three names are going to make people’s lists for sure-shot nominations.
Marion Cotillard’s already picked up the L.A. Film Critics’ award for her portrayal of legendary singer Edith Piaf in La Vie En Rose, and veteran actress Julie Christie topped the National Board of Review and the prestigious New York Film Critics’ lists.. Both are nominated for Golden Globe Awards.
My own personal selection would be Ellen Page from Juno, who is included on all of the major critics’ best-of lists. Consolation may need to come in the form of a Spirit Award, but it’s already been a breakout role for the 20-year-old, who’s so believable, original and heartbreaking as the movie’s pregnant teen almost-mommy.
The great thing about this year’s actress race is that other than those three being nominated, it’s still anyone’s guess who’ll also be nominated, and who will win.
© Lionsgate
I’ll place my bet on the Academy giving the award to Julie Christie, who’s been a Hollywood icon for years. She holds herself with grace offscreen, and onscreen in Away from Her, and would have the cachet of winning the award 40+ years after her first Best Actress win in 1965’s Darling. Hollywood loves a classic comeback…even though Christie never went away (she was nominated in ‘98 for Afterglow).
Surprises in the acting category, though, are the most fun. Adrian Brody’s (and the audience’s) look of astonishment when he picked up Best Actor for The Pianist was great.
© Walt Disney Pictures
Wouldn’t it be cool to see Amy Adams from Enchanted"actually win the prize? Or maybe Angelina Jolie could jump back into the spotlight and grab hold of a victory for A Mighty Heart, followed by a mighty acceptance speech.
One incredible scenario I’d love to see would be Keri Russell winning for Waitress. It would be a fitting and emotional tribute to her co-star, director and mentor Adrienne Shelley, who was murdered just months before its acclaimed debut at the Sundance Film Festival, and its success in art house theaters last summer.
Stacie Says:
It seems that the same names are showing up on most of the Best Actress nominee lists, whether it’s the Golden Globes or the critics’ organizations. Here’s how I think it breaks down:
Julie Christie plays an Alzheimer’s victim with grace and beauty in Away >From Her, and she’s winning awards left and right. Negatives? The film didn’t get a lot of attention when it came out, and campaigners better get moving before those Oscar ballots are due. I think Christie’s closest competition so far is La Vie En Rose’s Marion Cotillard and The Savages’ Laura Linney, who, with two nominations and no wins, might finally find this is her year.
As far as other potential winners, the last time Cate Blanchett was nominated in this category was for Elizabeth, which did very well and catapulted her to A-list status. This year, though, Elizabeth: The Golden Age was not nearly as successful (although no one faulted Cate’s acting). Then again, Oscar loves biopics, and critics and voters alike love Cate - plus the buzz is slowing on her other film this year, I’m Not There.

© Focus Features
Atonement is getting a lot of buzz, but Keira Knightley was just nominated in 2005 for Pride & Prejudice, another period piece by the same director. Plus, young actress Saoirse Ronan (who plays young Briony Tallis and is a likely Supporting Actress nominee) is stealing her thunder in this film.
There’s a strong chance that Ellen Page will be
nominated for Juno, but my gut tells me that she’s
too young (and too good). Academy voters will feel
she has plenty of time to get to the podium. Plus,
the film could be a little too quirky for mainstream
voters.
Angelina Jolie’s award-angling role in A Mighty
Heart, based on Mariane Pearl’s real quest to
find her missing journalist husband, makes her a safe
choice for a nomination. But the film came out so long
ago, and the superstar factor could hurt her.

in Sweeney Todd.
© Paramount Pictures
Personally, I’d like to see Helena Bonham Carter win
for Sweeney Todd, a classic lead performance
in a challenging film. She’s only been nominated once
before in this category, for 1997’s The Wings of
the Dove.
Best Supporting Actor
Chuck Says:
At first glance, this year’s Best Supporting Actor category seems as much of a no-brainer as the Best Supporting Actress race (which will be won by
Cate Blanchett for I’m Not There; see our previous predictions here). Javier Bardem – as the most memorable embodiment of evil since Hannibal Lecter – should win for No Country for Old Men.

© Miramax Films
However, the most predictable thing about the Oscars is that one of the Best Supporting Acting awards is always unpredictable. So while Bardem really is the deserving winner – he’s the cherry on top of No Country’s cinematic sundae – there are some other potential surprise candidates
who could sneak in and steal his award.
The most likely non-Bardem winner would be Hal Holbrook in Into
the Wild. I would actually love to see Holbrook and his co-star Catherine Keener sweep the Best Supporting categories. He is that good and affecting in the film, and their performances anchor
what’s already a great, albeit imperfect, movie.

© Lionsgate
If not Holbrook or Bardem,
Ben Foster in 3:10 to Yuma would be a great choice to pull off an upset. As a young upstart among a cast of veterans in this surprise western hit, Foster is as memorable as co-star titans Russell
Crowe and Christian Bale. While Bardem’s performance is a landmark piece of onscreen villainy, Foster is first-rate as a villain’s most trustworthy, sadistic sidekick.
Others leading the field include Tom Wilkinson as a desperate lawyer facing a crisis of conscience in
Michael Clayton; John Travolta as loveable Momma Turnblad in Hairspray; and Paul Dano as a young pastor facing down big bad oilman Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood.

© Paramount Vantage
And then there are two Hollywood stars who’ve been around for decades, but whose talent is only now being fully exploited. Robert Downey Jr., the former Hollywood bad boy who’s been born again as an A-list working actor, was mesmerizing as the obsessed, alcoholic journalist in Zodiac. And praise is also due to Josh Brolin, who broke out this year in a lead role in No Country, and several memorable supporting turns in Grindhouse, In the Valley of Elah and American
Gangster.
For this ‘80s movie buff, seeing ex-“Goonie” Brolin mentioned for an Oscar 20 years later, and Downey – the star of Less Than Zero – being
cast as next summer’s superhero in Iron Man…it’s movie nirvana.
Stacie Says:
I am inclined to agree with Chuck that Bardem is the one to beat even at this early stage in the game. Besides landing on nearly every critic’s list for No Country, he’s also been previously nominated for Best Actor (Before Night Falls).
As it’s shaping up, I think Hal Holbrook, too, is Bardem’s closest competition. He turned in one of the best-reviewed performances of the season in Wild, and he’s a revered stage and screen actor with many unrecognized past performances. A nomination, at least, is inevitable.

The Assassination of Jesse James.
© Warner Bros. Pictures
A few more likely for Oscar consideration: Casey Affleck in The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, who, as the simpering gang tag-along, turned out to be the real standout in the Brad Pitt starrer; perennial nominee Philip Seymour Hoffman, whom the buzz says has the best Oscar chances among the Charlie
Wilson’s War cast, and who also turned in lauded performances in The Savages and Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead; industry vet Max Von Sydow, with a small but terribly moving part in The Diving Bell and Butterfly and Philip Bosco, who is receiving great reviews as the forgetful rest-home dad in The Savages.

© Paramount Pictures
I’m with Chuck on Robert Downey, Jr., too. Although Zodiac came out a while ago, hopefully the Academy will not forget about this underappreciated actor, whom I’d love to see get nominated. Currently he’s not making it onto pundits’ early predictions lists, which is unfortunate. His turn as boozy, chain-smoking ace reporter Paul Avery truly stole the show.

© The Weinstein Company Films
Some other unlikely nominees I’d really like to see: Alan Rickman for Sweeney Todd and Christian
Bale, one of the best actors working today, for I’m Not There (he was also great in 3:10 to Yuma).
I think Paul Dano is a long shot to win for There Will Be Blood (too young), and although Travolta would lend the category some star power, the actor in a fat suit playing Edna Turnblad could be a little too campy for the Academy’s taste.
Best Supporting Actress
Stacie Says:
The Academy Supporting Actress category is an Oscar pool victory killer. It’s nearly impossible to predict who the Academy will go for: on-the-rise comers (Jennifer Hudson)? Lengthy careers (Judi Dench)? Kids (Anna Paquin)? Calling the Supporting Actress category is such risky business, no wonder people still suspect Jack Palance misread Marisa Tomei’s name as the winner for My Cousin Vinny, despite years of Academy protest to the contrary.

© Universal Pictures
This year, I’d go out on a limb to say it might be LESS of a crap shoot than most years, simply because of the dearth of potential nominees. Early word has Atonement’s Saorsie Ronen (meh), No Country for Old Men’s Kelly MacDonald (brief but terrific scenes), Gone Baby Gone’s Amy Ryan (also good in Dan in Real Life), Charlie Wilson’s War’s Julia Roberts (an obvious pitch) and the one nominee everyone agrees is a lock, I’m Not There’s Cate Blanchett (a woman playing not just any man, but Bob “Voice of the ’60s” Dylan? Stunt casting that’s sure to appeal to the Academy’s aging hippies and younger hipsters).

© Weinstein
Others who I think are possible but less likely nominees are Vanessa Redgrave (Atonement), Meryl Streep (Lions for Lambs), and Susan Sarandon (In the Valley of Elah)–but to me, those venerable actresses have turned in better work in better films and will be held to higher standards. Could this be Marisa Tomei’s
(Before the Devil Knows Your Dead) year of vindication? Personally, I’d love to see Knocked Up’s wisecracking, ball-busting Leslie Mann at least get a nomination, but that’s a long shot even if the Golden Globes go there.
Ultimately, I think Blanchett, a previous winner in this category for her turn as Katherine Hepburn in The Aviator, will walk off with Oscar again. She was nominated (for Notes on a Scandal) last year, and she may get a nom as Best Actress this year for Elizabeth: The Golden Age, but I’m Not There is exactly the daring, high-minded experiment that makes the Academy sit up and take notice.
Chuck Says:
Stacie’s made the right call for Best Supporting Actress for Cate Blanchett in the ode to Bob Dylan, I’m Not There. It’s a risky, daring and hip move to play the legendary musician and she’s already won raves for it.

© ThinkFilm
It would be sweet justice, though, for Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead’s Marisa Tomei to win one more time and prove the naysayers wrong. She was strong in In the Bedroom and she’s even better here, playing the sexy, long-suffering trophy wife/mistress in Sidney Lumet’s tightly-wound thriller.
Kelly MacDonald deserves kudos, too, for making her presence felt in a strong boys’ field in the bloody Coen brothers’ epic No Country for Old Men, and a nomination would be great, too, for Juliette Binoche’s warm performance in Dan in Real Life, playing a woman caught between two more brothers of varying maturity.
If the award is meant for making the most of an extremely limited amount of screen time (Shakespeare in Love’s Judi Dench won for her eight minutes of screen time), then Ruby Dee should be commended for her stirring moments alongside movie son Denzel Washington in American Gangster. A former winner of the Screen Actors Guild Life Achievement Award, Dee is the embodiment of dignity in the film. When she needs to smack a wake-up call into her powerful son, she’s powerfully focused herself.

© Fox Searchlight
Also affective and moving in different ways are Jennifer Garner in the upcoming Juno, and Tilda Swinton in Michael Clayton. Swinton oozes desperation and corporate deniability in Clayton, and Garner has her best role so far as a yuppie thirtysomething ready for maternity in Juno.
While I think Blanchett will pull off the win, I’d cast my own vote for Catherine Keener (a previous nominee for The 40 Year Old Virgin) as the maternal hippie in Into the Wild. In this story of a young guy’s adventure into the great,big world, Keener provides a measure of wisdom that’s achingly beautiful.
Best Comedy or Musical - Golden Globes
Chuck Says:
For The Best Comedy or Musical category at the Golden Globes is often a bellwether of assorted Oscar nominations. The last four years’ Globe winners in this category (Dreamgirls, Walk the Line, Sideways and Lost in Translation) all received various Oscar nominations, although none of them went on to win the Academy Award for Best Picture (which is usually reserved for dramas).
This year, the movie everyone has their eyes on is the sixth Tim Burton-Johnny Depp collaboration Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street, based on a real 19th century legend and Stephen Sondheim’s classic Broadway musical. The trailer looks fantastic. And even though Depp’s an untested singer, hey, if he could pull off Captain Jack Sparrow for an Oscar nomination, chances are good that this flick (and his performance in it) will be among the Globe nominees.
Another seeming lock for a Globe nod is the well-reviewed Hairspray, with Travolta, as proud mama Edna Turnblad, a candidate for Best Actor (or even Best Actress, if the Globes had a sense of humor). The movie received a 93 percent positive rating on review site Rotten Tomatoes, and Travolta has a loyal following among the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, the group that presents the Golden Globes.

© Universal Pictures
On the comedy front, Judd Apatow was 2007’s reigning king, directing the hit Knocked Up and producing summer’s other funniest comedy, Superbad. I laughed hardest at Superbad, but my bet is that Knocked Up, which was targeted for an older demographic, will get the Golden Globe nomination.
Other contenders for comedy would be the tale of a special pregnant teen named Juno (a winning sophomore effort from Thank You for Smoking director Jason Reitman) and Steve Carell’s movie about a widower dad on holiday with his family in Dan in Real Life.

© Buena Vista Pictures
Having seen all but Sweeney Todd (which hasn’t been screened yet for critics), I’m glad to report that it’s a good field this year for this category. If Depp and Burton can pull off their eccentric, darkly witty period musical, it’s the foregone winner. Two maverick Hollywood titans, an established story and the cachet “cool” factor…it’s a no-brainer.
It’s my personal hope - and yes, I’ve been thumping the drum for this one for awhile - that the Globes will not overlook Once, the small, perfect musical tale of two musicians who discover the once-in-a-lifetime experience of each other.
Stacie Says:
Chuck speaks the truth. The Globes are more than just a chance to watch A-list celebrities drunk on champagne and slurring thank-you speeches. They’re like your cheat sheet for the office Oscar pool–there’s a very good chance Globe winners will go on to win Academy Award nominations, if not Oscars.

© Warner Bros.
I’d also agree that Sweeney Todd is the one to watch, with its fantastic, high-profile blend of dark drama and songs by Depp and Helena Bonham Carter.
I don’t think, though, that the Globes will take note of such broad comedies as Superbad and Knocked Up. Sure, Borat got a nomination last year, but it’s in a different league from those coarse, ribald movies… funny as they were, and much as I liked ’em.
Is it likely Ratatouille will get a nom (or dare I say it, a win) in this category? The Incredibles and Finding Nemo were nominated in recent years. The Globes don’t award animated films, so they seem to land in the comedy/musical category even if they’re not necessary comedies in the traditional sense. Ratatouille certainly isn’t, but I find it hard to believe that the Globes would overlook the year’s best-reviewed animated film. Plus, it has that international appeal, which the Globes love.

© Fox Searchlight Pictures
Other possible contenders: I’ll go with Chuck on Once,
which most of the country missed, but did receive stellar reviews. Dan in Real Life has a shot thanks largely to Steve Carell, whose Little Miss Sunshine was nominated last year. And there’s also the little-seen but well-received Edith Piaf biopic, La Vie en Rose, whose star Marion Cotillard will absolutely get a nomination in the best actress musical or comedy category.
Potential Screen Actors Guild Award Candidates for Ensemble Cast

Stacie Says:
For our second He Said/She Said debate, Chuck and I are reviewing potential SAG candidates for Ensemble Cast.
The Screen Actors Guild Awards nominations will be announced on Dec. 20, and the category to watch is the organization’s equivalent to the Best Picture Academy Award: Outstanding Performance by a Cast.

Little Miss Sunshine.
© Fox Searchlight Pictures
Last year the award deservedly went to Little Miss, whose players (Steve Carell, Greg Kinnear,
